The human being is not naturally a killer. Every military that has studied the question has found the same thing: the default human response to pointing a weapon at another person and pulling the trigger is resistance, not compliance. Building a soldier means overcoming that resistance. The question nobody asks is what that costs.
"How the U.S. Military Trains Soldiers to Kill — And Why That's More Complicated Than It Sounds"
The research that established this understanding emerged primarily from the work of S.L.A. Marshall, a U.S. Army historian who conducted after-action interviews with infantry soldiers during World War II.
His finding — that approximately 75 percent of soldiers in close combat either did not fire their weapons at all or deliberately fired without aiming — produced a crisis in military training doctrine that resulted in systematic changes to how soldiers are prepared for killing.
The article is not finished. Click on the next page to continue.